Debating
public casebook
my paradigm
- My paradigm is I only weigh a money ballot. Call that truth over tech.
- They knew their case was strong but they didn't the judge fronted me a brick. Post-round went to the parking lot.
- Opps said I failed to provide a mechanism, my MG spent 4 minutes describing the tec-9 in my backpack. They dropped the clash.
- Had to translate the bylaws into sanskrit and latin just to pround with someone on my level.
- Chicago gets their own division but we get lumped in apda south? Give us apda below I'm from hell.
- If you tight call me my novice will kill himself
Auspicious phrases
- urbane intellectual elite
- preemptive tight theory
- phenomenological genocide
- pre-tabula rasa offense
- loses on the prag
- obviously bullshit
- truth nuke
- phantasm, dialectic, alienation,
Dubious phrases
Every single one of these phrases is useful. I'm at somebody's house and I say "it makes scene on the util", and I have to start cleaning their dishes because how can an apology be anything but material.
- affect-pilled emotional arguments
- pround (short for practice round)
- T (short for 'turp (short for interpretation))
- epsilon (in tandem with 'delta', as in the definition of a limit)
- K (I think this a reference to Kafka)
- swifty slop cases (apparently there's a lot of them)
- anti-STEM bias
That experiential contextual cush got me making principle arguments.
His cart got me entering the head space of evil actors.
Broke the "no substances" rule, experienced real tabula rasa.